1. Courts providing briefs to commercial vendors  the US perspective, This post also provides links to the copyright question noted as the second issue.
2. Question of copyright in briefs, factums, and other court documents prepared by lawyers/law firms. For developments in Canada check out the SLAW post.

The white paper also frames the legal landscape and background of authentication for primary legal materials in electronic format, and provides context and points to applicable resources. The aim of this collective effort is to promote the understanding of costs related to authentication and invite further discussion on the issue.”

White paper is located here. The link for reference is: http://www.mnhs.org/preserve/records/legislativerecords/docs_pdfs/CA_Authentication_WhitePaper_Dec2011.pdf

Council of Canadian Academic Law Library Directors Calgary Statement on Free Access to Legal Information. (2011)

Point three from the Calgary statement is directed to courts:

We urge all Canadian courts, legislatures and governments to commit to electronic publication of their primary legal publications by making definitive, “official” versions available immediately upon publication in stable, open, digital formats in a stable, freely-accessible online repository.

US Directors of Academic Law Libraries Durham Statement on Open Access to Legal Scholarship (2009)

The Legal Information Institutes Montreal Declaration on Free Access to Law (rev. 2007)

In the US they are working to make authentication easier. The US Uniform Law Commission recently adopted the Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act: act from the AALL site and backgrounder. (The act should soon be available on the ULC site)

The Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act establishes an outcomes-based, technology-neutral framework for providing online legal material with the same level of trustworthiness traditionally provided by publication in a law book. Increasingly, state governments are publishing laws, statutes, agency rules, and court rules and decisions online. In some states, important state-level legal material is no longer published in books, but is only available online.

The Act requires that official electronic legal material be:

• Authenticated, by providing a method to determine that it is unaltered;
• Preserved, either in electronic or print form; and
• Accessible, for use by the public on a permanent basis.

If a state preserves legal material electronically, it must provide for back-up and recovery, and ensure the integrity and continuing usability of the material.

• Review of cases since October 2010 as monitored by Wired;
• Warrantless GPS monitoring as reported by EFF;
• EFF involvement in cases related to copyright issues before the Supreme Court – sale of first right and foreign authored public domain works.

And from other US court levels and international jurisdictions, EFF provides the following news items:

• Using work computers for personal use;
• Ban on publishing distressing images;
• ISP filtering in Australia.

The Hague Convention of 1961: The Hague Conference on Private International Law

DEFAIT, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade provides assistance in authenticating documents and most provincial governments do as well:

Alberta; British Columbia; Saskatchewan; Ontario; Northwest Territories.